Method and apparatus for analysis of turbid media via single-element detection using structured illumination

ABSTRACT

Method and apparatus for obtaining qualitative and quantitative analysis of the optical properties or structures of tissue or turbid medium at one or more wavelengths via 1) detection at a single spatial location on the surface of a turbid medium (such as tissue) under two or more structured light conditions or 2) detection at two or more spatial locations on the surface under a single structured light condition.

CROSS-REFERENCE OF RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/840,999, filed Mar. 15, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,805, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,220,412, filed Nov. 19, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 61/262,807, filed Nov. 19, 2009, which are all fully incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

The embodiments described herein relate generally to optical measurement of turbid media and in particular to optical measurement of tissue absorption and scattering parameters via a single-element detector using one or more structured illuminations.

BACKGROUND

There has been considerable research in the use of near-infrared optical spectroscopy (NIRS) as a means for real-time in-vivo measurements of tissue optical properties which contain information on tissue structure and function. In the 600-1000 nm spectral region in particular, tissue is scattering dominated and the strongest molecular absorbers in tissue are oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin, water, and lipids. The highly diffusive photons probe a large sample volume, providing macroscopically averaged absorption and scattering properties at depths up to a few centimeters.

The amount of light reflected or transmitted from tissues is due to a complex combination of absorption, scattering and (typically very weak) fluorescence. In order to measure any of these optical properties of a given sample, one has to first separate/isolate the absorption effects from scattering effects. Possession of this capability is enabling for a wide range of medical (diagnostic, therapeutic monitoring, cosmetic) and non-medical applications (material inspection, visualization, photo-realistic rendering, agricultural inspection, chemical slurry and powder analysis).

NIR techniques (though actually not limited to the NIR spectral range) combine experimental measurements and model-based data analysis to quantitatively measure the bulk absorption (μ_(a)) and scattering (μ_(s)′) properties of the tissue. Once μ_(a) and μ_(s)′ are known at a variety of wavelengths, the concentration of the various molecular absorbers can be determined.

Several techniques have been developed over the last decade to measure tissue properties in vivo, and they can be broadly grouped into two categories: (1) photon migration techniques and (2) optical biopsy techniques. Most instruments of these types rely on a fiber optic contact probe measurement so that the source-detection geometry is well defined. The geometry allows for the quantitative measurement of absorption and scattering properties of the tissue, but it is limited to a single, small area. Photon migration instruments usually use source-detector separations of a few centimeters, resulting in spatial resolutions on the order of one centimeter, such that μ_(a) and μ_(s)′ can be determined for thick tissue, such as breast, brain and muscle. Optical biopsy techniques usually use source-detector distances on the order of 100's of microns, thus they interrogate a smaller spatial scale that is typically on the order of one millimeter.

For many medical diagnostic applications, there is need for techniques that combine some of the physiological information that photon migration and optical biopsy provide, but have a wide field, non-contact imaging capability. Multispectral imaging systems that use a camera with a tunable spectral light source (or spectral detection filters) have been used in this capacity. There is a fundamental issue, however, on the inability of camera systems to distinguish between light that is absorbed by the tissue and light that is scattered. Imaging systems that use full-field illumination (i.e. flash photography) cannot differentiate between the two effects and assumptions are made in order to provide “quantitative” biochemical analysis. In practice, this deficiency results in qualitative analysis that depicts relative concentration changes within an image.

A more detailed discussion of these techniques is provided in Cuccia. Modulated Imaging: A Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging Method for Wide-field Spectroscopy and Tomography of Turbid Media, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering (“Cuccia, Modulated Imaging”); and Cuccia, et al., Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging, J Biomed Opt 14(2), 024012 (2009) (“Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping”).

Due to the deficiencies of prior techniques, a technique and technology platform, referred to as “Modulated Imaging” (MI), was developed. The key aspect of this type of imaging is that the absorption and scattering components are separated and used to evaluate tissue structure and calculate quantitative biochemical maps. The MI method uses structured light projection and camera-based detection in order to obtain quantitative measurements of:

1. sub-surface tissue optical properties, including:

-   -   a. tissue absorption due to:         -   i. endogenous chromophores such as oxy- and             deoxy-hemoglobin, water, lipids, melanin, bilirubin,             porphyrins, etc. and         -   ii. exogenous dyes such as indocyanine green, methylene             blue, synthetic agents, etc.     -   b. tissue fluorescence/phosphorescence due to subsequent         remission of light after absorption from a molecule above     -   c. tissue scattering, (microscopic refraction) including both         scattering magnitude and direction, due to:         -   i. cellular structures such as nuclei, mitochondria, cell             membranes,         -   ii. extracellular structures, such as collagen         -   iii. exogenous agents

2. surface profile information (profilometry)

A detailed description of the MI method including spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) measurement, calibration, and analysis has been previously reported in Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,958,815, which are incorporated herein by reference.

From an apparatus perspective, an innovative aspect of MI/SFDI is its combination of a camera and a structured light projection system that allows one to reconstruct quantitative maps in 2D or 3D of tissue optical properties. Structured light illumination, also commonly referred to as spatially structured illumination, includes, among other, such illumination as sinusoidal illumination and periodic illumination. Generally, the structured illumination patterns give multiple “views” into the tissue and reveal the contrast between various structures and optical properties that would otherwise be obscured or mixed together. The system is typically non-contact, allowing for easy use in applications including surgical guidance where the tissue of interest can be interrogated without contamination.

From a method perspective, the camera images can be analyzed in a variety of ways to extract this quantitative information. The most common embodiment is “spatial frequency domain” analysis, involving either 1) processing a single Fourier-transform of the images, or 2) by directly manipulating a series of images under multiple structured illumination conditions—typically a spatial sine wave at various spatial phases. A strong benefit to methods that use approach 2) above is that they lend themselves more readily toward recovering high-resolution maps (in 2D or 3D) of the recovered properties, thus allowing for spatially-resolving structures and/or determining the depth of various structures/layers/etc.

Another innovation aspect of MI is the combination of simultaneous profile measurements along with tissue optical property determination. Profilometry is commonplace in areas such as machine vision and cosmetic dermatology.

As stated above, MI has the unique capability of spatially resolving optical absorption and scattering parameters, allowing wide-field quantitative mapping of tissue optical properties with the use of spatially-modulated illumination. FIG. 1 shows the configuration of a laboratory-grade system 10. Light from a halogen lamp 11 is expanded by a condenser 12 onto a spatial light modulator (SLM) 15. The current system uses a Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) from Texas Instruments which is a 1024×768 mirror array that can generate and project arbitrary grayscale patterns. Such patterns are directed through a projector lens 16 and reflected off a mirror 17 to the surface of the tissue T and the diffusely reflected light is then recorded by a digital CCD camera 19. In the laboratory instrument, a filter wheel 13 was used to interrogate a discrete number of wavelengths. Instead of a filter wheel, a tunable filter or tunable spectral source can be used to interrogate a discrete number of wavelengths. Crossed linear polarizers 14 and 18 can be introduced into the source and detection light paths to remove specular reflectance. The SLM 15, camera 19 and spectral device are synchronized with a computer and/or trigger board, enabling fast acquisition of a series of patterns at various spatial frequencies. A turbid reflectance standard (such as a TiO2-based silicone phantom) can be used to calibrate the source intensity and to correct for spatial non-uniformities in both the illumination and imaging systems.

Periodic illumination patterns of various spatial frequencies are projected over a large (many cm²) area of a sample. Typically, sine-wave illumination patterns are used. The reflected image captured by the camera differs from the illumination patterns due to the optical property characteristics of the sample. The demodulation of these spatially-modulated waves characterizes the sample modulation transfer function (MTF), which embodies the optical property information of the tissue.

For example, the tissue can be illuminated with a spatial pattern of the form:

$\begin{matrix} {S = {\frac{S_{o}}{2}\left\lbrack {I + {M_{o}{\cos \left( {{2\pi \; f_{x}} + \alpha} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where S₀, M₀, f_(x) and a are the illumination source intensity, modulation depth, spatial frequency, and spatial phase, respectively. The diffusely reflected intensity, I, is a sum of the spatially-varying (AC) and spatially-constant (DC) components of the illumination signal. These AC and DC spatial components do not relate to other uses of the terms AC and DC, such as the AC and DC components of electrical signals, or the AC and DC temporal components, for example those delineated in Sevick-Muraca U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,754. The underlying physics, detection schemes, analysis methods and mathematical models aimed at characterizing these AC and DC spatial components are all distinct from other uses of these terms.

The top row of images, shown in FIG. 2, show the images obtained for illumination patterns at four spatial frequencies (with only 1 phase of each frequency shown). The AC component of the reflected intensity, I_(AC), can be modeled as:

I _(AC) M _(AC)(x,f _(x))·cos(2πf _(x)+α)

Here, M_(AC)(x,f_(x)) represents the amplitude of the reflected photon density “standing wave” at frequency f_(x). Note that M_(AC) can be a function of position, x. To obtain M_(AC)(x,f_(x)), a simple time domain amplitude demodulation method is employed, illuminating a sinusoid pattern three times at the same spatial frequency, with phase offsets α=0, 2/3π and 4/3π radians. M_(AC)(x,f_(x)) can then be calculated algebraically at each spatial location, x_(i), by:

M _(AC)(x,f _(x))=[(I ₁ −I ₂)²+(I ₂ −I ₃)+(I ₃ −I ₁)]^(1/2)  (3)

The spatially-varying DC amplitude, M_(DC)(x), can be calculated using:

M _(DC)(x,f _(x))=[I ₁ +I ₂ +I ₃]/3  (4)

where I₁, I₂, and I₃ represent the I_(AC) image values at each location with shifted spatial phases.

Finally, measurement of a reference turbid phantom of known optical properties allows model-based calibration for the source intensity, S₀, and therefore conversion of M_(AC) and M_(DC) to calibrated diffuse reflectance, R_(AC) and R_(DC), respectively. Once the AC and DC components of the reflectivity are determined, a “White Monte Carlo” (WMC) method is used to provide accurate and rapid models of predicting light transport over a wide range of reflectivities. At each wavelength, the spatial-frequency-dependent diffuse reflectance is fitted to WMC forward predictions for every pixel in the image and obtain the μ_(a) and μs′ optical properties, as shown at the bottom of FIG. 2. This can be performed with a rapid two-frequency lookup table using a minimal 3-phase, single frequency image set (by demodulating and averaging the images to obtain AC and DC amplitude maps, respectively). This simple algorithm can easily be implemented for real-time processing and/or implementation on camera FPGA hardware. Alternatively, this analysis could be performed via other predictive, statistical, or heuristic models.

By mapping the absorption coefficient at multiple wavelengths, quantitative spectroscopy of tissue can optionally be performed. The result is a 3D data cube with an absorption spectrum at each spatial location. Knowledge of the extinction coefficients of the tissue chromophores (e.g. oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin, lipids, water, etc) allows these spectra to be fitted to a linear Beer-Lambert absorption model and determine the quantitative concentrations of each chromophore.

Any of the aforementioned point detection systems, measurements, and analyses could be further spatially multiplexed to yield 1D, 2D, or 3D spatial representations of the turbid medium optical properties and/or structures. From a hardware standpoint, this would include multiple copies of a previously described detector setup, or an optical relay or scanning system to relay detector information from various locations on the sample.

As described above, the generally regarded innovative aspect of MI is the combination of a camera (2D light sensor) and a structured illumination system (2D projector) to enable the measurement and 2D/3D mapping of optical properties and tissue structures. Although this system can be constructed with consumer-grade electronics, it nevertheless requires a certain level of cost and complexity due to the presence of a 2D sensor. For example, when the method is extended for spectroscopy (measurement of multiple wavelengths), it adds significant system complexity and/or measurement time constraints, requiring either serial single-wavelength measurements or bulky and expensive multi-spectral imaging systems. In addition, although combination/integration with measurement methods that use time-modulation of light is also theoretically possible (in addition to spatial structuring or spatial modulation of light), this has never been feasible or desirable as it requires expensive, bulky, and low-fidelity time gating systems for cameras.

Thus, it is desirable to provide a less costly and complex system to analyze the optical properties and structures of turbid media.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The details of the example embodiments, including structure and operation, may be gleaned in part by study of the accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, all illustrations are intended to convey concepts, where relative sizes, shapes and other detailed attributes may be illustrated schematically rather than literally or precisely.

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a conventional modulated imaging system.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the data analysis flow of the modulated imaging technique.

FIG. 3A is a schematic of a single-element detector and intensity-modulated source in space.

FIG. 3B is a schematic of a single-element detector and intensity-modulated source in wavelength.

FIG. 3C is a schematic of single-element detection at two locations under one spatially-structured condition.

FIG. 3D is a schematic of single-element detection under two spectrally-diverse single-element detectors under a single spectrally-structured illumination condition.

FIGS. 4A and 4B are illumination graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing two illuminations and one detector.

FIGS. 4C and 4D are reflectance graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing two illuminations and one detector.

FIGS. 5A and 5B are illumination and reflectance graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing one illumination and two detectors.

FIGS. 6A and 6B are graphs of bulk absorption (μ_(a)) and scattering (μs′) as a function of the AC and DC reflectance components.

FIGS. 7A and 7B are illumination and reflectance graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing one illumination and two detectors.

FIGS. 8A and 8B are illumination graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing two illuminations and one detector.

FIGS. 8C and 8D are reflectance graphs of a single-element detection method utilizing two illuminations and one detector

FIG. 9 is a schematic of a structured illumination system with a single element detector.

FIG. 10A is a plot showing an example of raw demodulated spectra, M_(AC)(λ,f_(x)), collected from a tissue simulating a liquid phantom containing nigrosin, intralipid and water.

FIG. 10B is a plot showing reflectance calibrated by the reference phantom measurement.

FIG. 10C is a plot showing the diffuse “MTF,” shown at 680 nm in this example.

FIG. 10D is a plot showing the resultant absorption and reduced scattering spectra.

FIG. 11A is a plot showing optical properties of high and low albedo phantoms including measured and expected absorption spectra.

FIG. 11B is a plot showing optical properties of high and low albedo phantoms including accuracy between expected and measured absorption values.

FIG. 11C is a plot showing optical properties of high and low albedo phantoms including measured and expected reduced scattering spectra.

FIG. 11D is a plot showing optical properties of high and low albedo phantoms including accuracy between expected and measured reduced scattering.

FIG. 12 is a plot showing measured absorption spectrum from the volar forearm and a subplot displaying the corresponding reduced scattering spectrum for this particular measurement.

It should be noted that elements of similar structures or functions are generally represented by like reference numerals for illustrative purpose throughout the figures. It should also be noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of the preferred embodiments.

DESCRIPTION

The various embodiments and examples provided herein are generally directed to a method and apparatus for obtaining qualitative and quantitative analysis of the optical properties or structures of tissue or turbid medium via detection via a single-element detector at a single spatial location or defined collection area on the surface of a turbid medium (such as tissue) under two or more structured light conditions or illuminations. The single spatial location or defined collection area is a localized spot or region and is preferably sized or dimensioned on the order of a feature of the illumination function. The signal detected on the single-element detector comprises a combination of the signals from all points within the single spatial location or defined collection area, wherein the single spatial location or defined collection area comprises one or more points.

Alternatively, detection is accomplished via a single-element detector at two or more spatial locations or defined collection areas on the surface of tissue or other turbid medium under a single structured light condition or illumination. Instead of focusing on a single spatial location or defined collection area that is subject to two or more structured light conditions or illuminations, two or more single-element detectors focus on two or more spatially diverse locations or defined collection areas allowing for the detection of differing structured light conditions or illuminations without modifying the source of structured light or illumination.

In the single-element detection methods noted above, detection can be implemented a) with a single-element detector/sensor in contact with the surface of the tissue or other turbid medium or b) otherwise delivered to a single-element detector via a fiber optic or lens relay system. The structured illumination can be implemented in contact form (via an LCD, LED array, or filtered backlight, for example) or non-contact form (via a slide projector, DMD/DLP, LCOS, or coherent interference, for example). In a preferred embodiment the structured illumination is spatially structured, but could alternatively be spectrally structured (changing the wavelength-dependent source intensity) to reveal optical properties and structures. Diagrams of these modes of operation are given in FIGS. 3A-3D.

Turning to FIG. 3A, a method and apparatus 100 is depicted for single element detection using multiple spatially structured illuminations. At step (101), multiple structured light patterns are generated by a spatial light modulator (SLM) 110. Next, at step (103) spatially structured light conditions are projected through a projection lens, a generalized relay, or a contact illumination system 112 onto the surface of the target medium T comprising tissue or other turbid medium to illuminate the target medium T with multiple spatially-structured light conditions. At step (105), light remitted, i.e., diffusely reflected or transmitted, from a single spatial location on the surface of the target medium T is coupled to a single-element detector 116 through a detector lens, a generalized relay, or a contact detection system 114.

Instead of using multiple spatially-structured light patterns, FIG. 3C depicts a method and apparatus 100′ for single element detection using a single spatially structured illumination and one or more single element detectors. At step (101′), a single structured light pattern is generated by a spatial light modulator (SLM) 110. Next, at step (103′) a spatially-structured light condition is projected through a projection lens, a generalized relay, or a contact illumination system 112 onto the surface of the target medium T to illuminate the target medium T with a single spatially-structured light condition. At step (107), light remitted from two or more spatially diverse locations on the surface of the target medium T is coupled through a detector lens, a generalized relay, or a contact detection system 114 to two or more spatially diverse single-element detectors 115 and 116, or to one single-element detector 116 that is moveable or able to be oriented in two or more configurations or spatially diverse locations to detect the light remitted from the two or more spatially diverse locations on the surface of the target medium T.

Alternatively, FIG. 3B depicts a method and apparatus 102 for single element detection using multiple spectrally-structured illuminations. At step (104), multiple spectrally-structured light conditions generated by a variable multi-spectral light source 111 are projected through an illumination lens, a generalized relay, or a contact illumination system 112 onto the surface of the target medium T to illuminate the target medium T with multiple spectrally-structured light conditions. At step (105), light remitted from the surface of the target medium T is coupled to a single-element detector 116 through a detector lens, a generalized relay, or a contact detection system 114.

Instead of using multiple spectrally-structured light patterns, FIG. 3D depicts a method and apparatus 102′ for single element detection using a single spectrally-structured illumination and two or more single element detectors. At step (104′), a single spectrally structured light condition generated by a variable multi-spectral light source 111 is projected through an illumination lens, a generalized relay, or a contact illumination system 112 onto the surface of the target medium T to illuminate the target medium T with a single spectrally-structured light condition. At step (108), two or more spectrally diverse light signals remitted from the surface of the target medium T are coupled through a detector lens, a generalized relay, or a contact detection system 114 and beam splitter, spectrometer, or other spectral selection device 117 to two or more spectrally diverse single-element detectors 118 and 119.

Turning to FIGS. 4A-4D, a single-element detection method is depicted using one detector and two structured illuminations. As depicted in FIG. 4A the first illumination, I_(AC+DC), comprises a sinusoidal waveform, I_(AC), with a constant offset, I_(DC). The second illumination, I_(DC), shown in FIG. 4B, comprises an illumination having a spatially constant intensity equivalent to the constant offset, I_(DC), of the first illumination, I_(AC+DC). The magnitude of the remitted light corresponding to the first illumination, I_(AC+DC), and detected by a single-element detector at point x₍₁₎ on the surface of the illuminated tissue or other turbid medium is depicted as R_(AC+DC) in FIG. 4C. The magnitude of the remitted light corresponding to the second illumination, I_(DC), and detected by a single-element detector at point x₍₁₎ on the surface of the illuminated tissue or other turbid medium is depicted for the as R_(DC) in FIG. 4D. Although shown as a point, i.e., x₍₁₎, the single spatial region from which signals are collected cannot in practice be an infinitesimally small point location but rather is a localized spot or region. The magnitude of the reflected light detected by the single-element detector resulting from only the AC component of the first structured illumination is determinable from: R_(AC)=R_(AC+DC)−R_(DC).

Alternatively, FIGS. 5A-5B depicts a single-element detection method using two spatially diverse detectors and one structured illumination. As depicted in FIG. 5A, the structured illumination, I_(AC+DC), comprises a sinusoidal waveform, I_(AC), with a constant offset, I_(DC). The magnitude of the remitted light corresponding to the AC and DC components of the structured illumination that is detected by first and second single-element detectors at a first location x₍₁₎ and a second location x₍₂₎ on the surface of the illuminated tissue or other turbid medium, as depicted in FIG. 5B, is determinable from: R_(DC)=(Rx₍₁₎+Rx₍₂₎)/2; R_(AC)=(Rx₍₁₎−Rx₍₂₎)/2. The magnitude of remitted light corresponding to the AC and DC components of the structured illumination that is detected by first and second single-element detectors at a third location x₍₃₎ and a fourth location x₍₄₎ on the surface of the illuminated tissue or other turbid medium, is determinable from: R_(DC)=Rx₍₄₎; R_(AC)=Rx₍₃₎−Rx₍₄₎.

As shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the values of R_(DC) and R_(AC) can be used to determine the bulk absorption (μa) and scattering (μs′) properties of the tissue or other turbid medium. For example, as depicted in FIG. 6B, an experimental or model generated look-up table can be used to determine the bulk absorption (μa) and scattering (μs′) properties of the tissue or other turbid medium.

In some embodiments of single-element detection methods, it may be advantageous to allow the light collected by the single-element detector to be larger than a single “point” location or localized area so that instead of collecting light from a single “point” location, light is collected from a collection of points simultaneously where the signal detected on the single-element detector would be a combination of the signals from all the points included in a de-localized defined collection area. The defined collection area can be on the order of or larger than a feature of the illumination function. Measurement or detection of light collected from such a defined collection area could be accomplished simply by defocusing of a detection lens, or otherwise allowing the detector aperture to collect light from a larger area of the sample surface. In the same manner as before, the spatial content of the source-detector configuration would be designed to isolate the desired information content within the tissue or other turbid medium. The data from this approach would be treated in a similar fashion as with previously described source-detector configurations, including post-processing, filtering, calibration, model-based or lookup-table based calculations. Finally, this concept of de-localization in space can just as easily be applied to localization in wavelength spectrum, as it applies to the previously-described spectral modulation schemes.

Turning to FIGS. 7A and B, a single-element detection method utilizing a de-localized defined collection area is shown. A single periodic function, I_(AC), in x (such as a sine wave) is illuminated with a constant offset, I_(DC). For example, the illumination could be in the form I_(total)=cos(k*x)+I_(DC), where x is the lateral spatial dimension and k is the spatial frequency. The reflectance or transmittance is measured by single-element detectors D1 and D2 with two differing area-collection schemes. For example, the detector D1 could be designed to collect information over a half-integer-multiple (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, etc) of the illumination function spatial period and produce a magnitude measurement M₁. The detector D2 could be designed to collect information over an integer-multiple (1, 2, 3, etc) period of the periodic illumination, producing magnitude measurement M₂. As the measurement M₂ was performed over integer-multiples of the illumination period, the AC component would cancel, giving R_(DC)=M₂. However, M₁ contains both AC contrast in addition to DC information and could be used to calculate the AC reflectance component. If the integer multiple was the same for both conditions, then M₁ and M₂ would differ by just a half-period and R_(AC)=|M₂−M₁|.

In the alternative, as shown in FIGS. 8A-8D, the tissue or other turbid medium is illuminated with a periodic function, I_(AC), in x (such as a sine wave) with a constant offset, I_(DC). For example, the periodic function illumination with constant offset could be in the form I_(total)=cos(k*x)+I_(DC), where x is the lateral spatial dimension and k is the spatial frequency. The tissue or other turbid medium is also illuminated with an illumination having a spatially constant intensity, I_(DC). The reflectance or transmittance is measured by one single-element detector D1 with the same area-collection scheme. For example, the detector D1 could be designed to collect information over a half-integer-multiple (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, etc) of the illumination function spatial period and produce magnitude measurement M₁ for the reflectance or transmittance corresponding to the periodic function illumination with constant offset, I_(total)=cos(k*x)+I_(DC). For the reflectance or transmittance corresponding to the illumination having a spatially constant intensity, I_(DC), the detector D1 produces a magnitude measurement M₂. As measurement M₂ was performed on the remittance due to the spatially constant illumination, there is no AC component and, thus, gives R_(DC)=M₂. M₁ contains both AC contrast in addition to DC information and could be used to calculate the AC reflectance component where R_(AC)=|M₂−M₁|.

In more complex scenarios, detecting light from arbitrarily complex area functions designed to reveal the desired sample properties or structures, such as separately isolating remitted light from the crests and valleys of a periodic illumination function, producing measurements M₁ and M₂. In this case R_(DC)=M₁+M₂ and R_(AC)=|M₂−M₁|.

In another example, a Bessel function plus some constant offset, I_(DC), is illuminated where the total illumination is I_(total)=J₀(k*x)+I_(DC), where J₀ is a Bessel function of order zero, x is the spatial (lateral) position and k is the lateral spatial frequency, and detect (with a single-element detector) the total light remitting or transmitting from positions x=0 to x_(max). This magnitude measurement is referred to as M₁. Separately, one could illuminate with a spatially-constant intensity, I_(DC), only, thus detecting a different magnitude, M₂ with the same detector configuration. These magnitudes M₁ and M₂ alone would be sufficient for calculating optical properties and/or locating structures (in a similar fashion as with previously described source-detector orientations), even though they have not isolated a single spatial feature of the illumination beam (e.g. a crest or peak of the sine wave). For example, if M₁ and M₂ are the magnitudes of the measurements made by the first and second illumination conditions, and the maximum radius of detection x_(max) was set to a “zero” of the illumination Bessel function, then a magnitude estimate for DC and AC components of the reflectance, R_(DC) and R_(AC) respectively, would be R_(DC)=M₂ and R_(AC)=M₁−M₂. It has been previously shown how a minimum measurement R_(DC) and R_(AC) are sufficient for calculating optical properties, such as the absorption and reduced scattering coefficients, μ_(a) and μ_(s)′, respectively.

The advantage of the single element detection methods described herein is primarily in the single element detector aspect of the apparatus. The instrument measurement, calibration, and analysis methods can optionally be practiced as described above with regard to the MI method and further expanded upon in Cuccia, Modulated Imaging, Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,958,815, which are incorporated herein by reference, except that 1) the detector is a (a) single-element sensor or other optical detector, or (b) the entrance pupil for an optical relay device (such as the face of an optical fiber, for example), or (c) other point or localized area detection system, and 2) there is no spatial dependence to the detected signal (e.g. the ‘x’ parameter) as there is only one “signal” detected per remitted structured light pattern. As a result, non-local information from spatially structured light waves, extending in the x-y plane, can be detected from measurement at a single spatial location. This capability derives from the phenomenon that the shape and magnitude of the reflected light wave at a single spatial location is a cumulative result of optical property-dependent multiple scattering within a volume that is typically larger than the single spatial point detection. Therefore the internal scattering tends to cause non-local or “global” effects on the structured light wave, typically resulting in a blurring or loss of contrast in the reflected structured light pattern. The lateral spatial scales of this blurring depend on the length scales of absorption and scattering in the medium, which can be much larger than the spot sampled by a single-element detector at the single spatial location. In this approach, two or more structured light projections give multiple “views” of the complex wave, allowing the non-local behavior of the waves to be detected by a single local measurement. Previously, this behavior was measured using a 2D camera covering a wide field of view in order to capture the spatially-dependent information in the x-y plane. As an example of this detection phenomenon, consider detecting a remitted peak or valley due to a sinusoidally-illuminated turbid medium in the form 1+cos(f_(x)*x). Due to the turbidity, the intensity measured at the specific peak or valley is a cumulative result of the internal properties extending laterally beyond multiple spatial periods away from the detection point. The “non-locality” of this sensing will depend on the relationship of the spatial period (1/f_(x)) to the scales of light interaction within the medium (1/μ_(a) and 1/μ_(s)′). Put in another way, due the turbidity, a localized change or perturbation in optical properties (such as an increased absorption due to a tumor or blood vessel) will cause the remitted structured light pattern to be modified non-locally. In the above sinusoidal example, multiple peaks and crests will be modified as a result of a perturbation that is much smaller in extent than the spatial period of the light.

Analysis and/or reconstruction of single-point or single spatial location data would include one or more of the following steps:

1) signal conditioning of the measured data, such as signal averaging, filtering, normalization or background subtraction, to reduce the impact of undesired artifacts, such as noise or background signals;

2) isolation of an amplitude or phase component of the spatially-varying (AC) signal, such as:

a) demodulating the measured structured light signal due to a single spatial frequency of illumination to isolate the amplitude and/or phase of the spatially varying component to the reflected or transmitted wave, or

b) performing the above where the spatially varying signal is instead composed of multiple spatial frequencies (a superposition of frequencies). Typically, this demodulation is done by combining data arising from multiple phase projections of the same structured light wave. Simple approaches to calculating amplitude or phase of the wave are discussed in Cuccia, Quantitation and Mapping and Bassi et al., Spatial shift of spatially modulated light projected on turbid media, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 25(11) 2833 (2008)(“Bassi, Spatial Shift”), which is incorporated by reference. One way is to combine the data to obtain amplitude data as follows:

AC amplitude=[√(⅔)]√([A−B] ² +[B−C] ² +[C−A] ²),

where A, B, and C are data points collected under illumination of a spatial sinusoid with a phase of 0, 120, and 240 degrees, respectively;

3) isolation of an amplitude component of the spatially-constant (DC) signal, such as a single measurement under constant (planar) illumination conditions or computing an average or mean of multiple phase projections. See, Bassi, Spatial Shift; Cuccia, Quantitation and Mapping;

4) normalization or calibration of the AC or DC signals above with respect to measurements on a sample with known optical properties (a calibration phantom);

5) determination of the optical properties (absorption, reduced scattering, anisotropy, fluorescence, etc) of the sample based on one or more AC or DC signals, for example via model-based analysis (e.g. analytic, stochastic, or finite-element solvers), comparisons to previously-acquired data (e.g. measurements of phantom samples of known optical properties), or other heuristic approaches;

6) the above calculation in 5) where the computation can be performed via a look-up table of a-priori tabulated results;

7) determination of the depths of structures within the sample, for example via ratios or differences of AC and/or DC signals, model-based analysis (e.g. multi-layer or inclusion-based solvers), or other heuristic approaches;

8) combination of 5) or 6) with 7) to obtain sample depth and optical property determination such that an optical property can be assigned to a specific region;

9) use of bulk or region-wise optical properties at one or more wavelengths to determine the concentration or cross-section, and/or location of a particular material, dye, chromophore, etc.,

10) combination of metrics in 9) to provide simple indices that inform on the health, composition or other state of the sample;

11) comparison of a collection of data calculations in 1-10 obtained via various regions of the sample, multiple measurements of the same site, multiple wavelengths from the same site, multiple sites, multiple specimens or people, and/or multiple times in order to assess sample variation, compare one sample to a population, inform a therapeutic outcome, perform a diagnostic analysis, etc.

By making structured light measurements with a single element sensor (or otherwise detecting light remitting or transmitting from a single point or spatial location on the sample), the complexity of a 2D sensor detection is eliminated. This generally leads to three major practical advantages:

-   -   1. the core instrument can be potentially smaller, more         sensitive, lower-noise, better intensity resolution, less         expensive, and/or operate at lower power;     -   2. other measurement multiplexing approaches become more         feasible, such as spectral multiplexing (via a spectrometer or         detector array, for example), and polarization multiplexing; and     -   3. combination with other measurement approaches such as         time-based measurements, or time-domain and         time-frequency-domain photon migration techniques

Turning to FIG. 9, a schematic of an example of a structured illumination system 200 with a single element detector is shown. As depicted, the system 200 includes a near infrared digital projector 210 comprising a broadband projection illumination source 211. Light from the illumination source 211 is delivered to a digital micro-mirror device (DMD) 215 via an integrating rod-based “light engine” 212 such as those provided in DLP projectors. The light from the DMD 215 is then imaged on to the surface of the target medium T, resulting in a projection field of view, e.g., a field of view of 50×68 mm. Collection optics (lens) 218 capture light remitted from a 2 mm diameter center subsection of the illuminated region. As depicted, these optics 218 couple light collected from this region to the distal tip of a 400 micron detector fiber 222. The light remitted from the sample is then delivered to a tunable spectrograph 224, tuned to a wavelength range and resolution, e.g., a wavelength range of 430-1050 nm, with a resolution of ˜1 nm. A 16-bit CCD 226 acts as the detector. A crossed 2-inch diameter wire-grid polarizing filters 214 can be used to reject specular reflection from the surface of the sample. The polarizer 214 is inserted between the DMD 215 and projection optics 216 and the analyzer 220 is placed between the fiber 222 and collection optics 218.

As described below, the system 200 can be utilized in a non-contact method for the determination of quantitative optical properties of turbid medium, which is referred to hereafter as spatially modulated quantitative spectroscopy (SMoQS). Through measuring the broadband reflectance from an unknown sample as a function of the spatial frequency of the projected illumination patterns, the absolute absorption and reduced scattering coefficients can be calculated without a priori assumptions of the chromophores present.

For all samples measured in a SMoQS investigation utilizing the system 200, 15 illumination patterns based on two-dimensional sinusoids similar to that illustrated in FIG. 10A were used to characterize the samples. The spatial frequency of patterns spanned from 0 to 0.2 mm⁻¹ in steps of 0.05 mm⁻¹. Using a modulation/demodulation scheme that has been described by Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping each specific spatial frequency was projected 3 times, each with a phase shift of 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Data was acquired three times for each projected phase in order to further reduce noise. The raw spectral data were stored for each projection pattern and each phase. A reference calibration measurement was acquired from a liquid reference sample having known optical properties. This step is used to characterize the inherent MTF of the instrument.

Instead of measuring sequences of reflectance from a single wavelength across multiple pixels, in the SMoQS method, the entire broadband reflectance is measured for a single spatial location. This particular approach allows for a far greater wavelength range to be measured, however it is at the expense of imaging capabilities. In this case a full broadband spectrum is collected for every spatial frequency and phase. The broadband reflectance is then demodulated to extract the AC component of the detected light:

$\begin{matrix} {{M_{AC}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)} = {\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}\begin{matrix} \left\{ {\left\lbrack {{I_{1}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)} - {I_{2}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)}} \right\rbrack^{2} + \left\lbrack {{I_{2}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)} - {I_{3}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)}} \right\rbrack^{2} +} \right. \\ \left. \left\lbrack {{I_{3}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)} - {I_{1}\left( {\lambda,f_{x}} \right)}} \right\rbrack^{2} \right\}^{1\text{/}2} \end{matrix}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

resulting in the broadband AC reflectance for a given sample as a function of spatial frequency (FIG. 10(a)). Here, I_(i)(λ,f_(x)) denotes the measured reflectance spectrum at the three projected phases, i=[1,2,3]. Through the use of a reference phantom having known optical properties, the data can be calibrated and be given units of absolute reflectance (FIG. 10B). Here the highest trace corresponds to data acquired at a spatial frequency of 0/mm (i.e. planar illumination) and the lowest corresponds to data acquired at a spatial frequency of 0.2/mm. As the spatial frequency increases, the absorption band, which appears as a dip in the reflectance spectrum at 980 nm, becomes less apparent. This is in agreement with observations of decreasing absorption contrast with increasing spatial frequency as reported by Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping. At each wavelength, the reduction in AC reflectance amplitude as a function of spatial frequency (i.e. the effective MTF) can then be modeled and analyzed via Monte Carlo-based simulations (FIG. 10C) via discrete Hankel transformation of point-source reflectance predictions Cuccia, Quantitation and mapping. From this model, the contributions of absorption and scattering can be identified at each wavelength independently, resulting in broadband spectra for absorption and scattering without the use of any spectral constraints or an assumed power-law dependence for reduced scattering (FIG. 10D). Unlike diffusion-based models, this approach is not limited by albedo or frequency range. For modeling purposes, we assumed an anisotropy (g) value of 0.7 for the intralipid phantoms and 0.9 for skin. To demonstrate SMoQS' ability to accurately recover optical properties, a series of homogeneous liquid phantoms was prepared. Since it has been well characterized in terms of optical properties, Intralipid® (20%, Fresenius Kabi) was used as the scattering agent within the phantom. (H. J van Staveren et. al, Light scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm, Applied Optics 30(31), 4507-4514 (1991) (van Staveren)).

For these studies, multi-distance FDPM measurements (R. C. Haskell et al., Boundary Conditions for the Diffusion Equation in Radiative Transfer, Journal of the Optical Society of America-A, 10, 1-15, (1994)) were also performed to validate these values within 650-850 nm, independently confirming that the prepared phantoms match the expected scattering values that were determined analytically using the method proposed by van Staveren.

For simplicity and experimental control, a single dye was used as the primary absorbing agent in the liquid phantom. In this initial investigation, water-soluble nigrosin (Sigma Aldrich) was chosen as the absorber due to its broad spectral profile over the wavelength range of interest, allowing for a large dynamic range of absorption values to be measured in a single phantom. Moreover, the distributions of these values grossly mimic distributions that might be encountered in tissue—namely a broad absorption peak in the visible and low absorption in the near infrared. The spectral line shape and quantitative absorption values of each nigrosin solution, was measured, in the specific concentrations used in the liquid phantoms without any scatterer present, and confirmed using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-3600) over the entire wavelength range of interest.

Three phantoms were made, each designed with unique sets of optical properties. Two of these were treated as investigational samples. The first of these was a high albedo phantom, designed to have absorption and reduced scattering values ranges of [0.01-0.1] and [1.0-2.0] mm⁻¹, respectively, whereas the second phantom had a low albedo with absorption between [0.1-0.3] mm⁻¹ and reduced scattering in the range [0.5-1.2] mm⁻¹. These ranges extend well beyond expected values in the NIR, though remain conservative relative to values expected in the visible regime. The optical properties of the third phantom were chosen to fall between those of the two test phantoms, μ_(a)=[0.1-0.3] and μ_(s)′=[1.0-2.0]. This was used as a reference calibration to characterize the system MTF and spectral throughput.

FIGS. 11A-11D show the extracted optical properties for the two liquid phantoms. In FIG. 11A, the recovered absorption spectra for the low and high albedo phantoms are plotted along with the known concentrations of nigrosin and water used in the preparation of the phantoms. These absorption values were determined by the SMoQS method at each wavelength independently, yet faithfully produce the expected spectra, even in spectral regions where the source illumination and system throughput were weak, (i.e. 430-500 nm and 1000-1050 nm). Similar results were produced for the quantitative determination of reduced scattering coefficient (FIG. 11C). The recovery of optical properties was also successful as a function of the magnitudes of the expected values (FIGS. 11B, 11D). This technique demonstrates a highly linear response across the range expected optical properties tested, resulting in R-Square values of 0.985 and 0.996 for absorption and scattering, respectively.

For demonstration of basic feasibility, a measurement on in-vivo human tissue was also collected. In this particular case, a subject's volar forearm was placed under the projection illumination and light was specifically collected from a region of tissue that contained a large vein (IRB study protocol #1996-200). Using the same reference phantom that was employed in the liquid phantom experiment, absorption and reduced scattering spectra were extracted, shown in FIG. 12. The absorption spectrum was then fit in a linear least-squares sense to a basis set of spectra that included oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin, water and melanin. Since the signal to noise of the system was particularly weak (<1) at the spectral limits of this measurement, this fit was only performed over a range of 500-1000 nm. The measured spectrum of skin was qualitatively well described by these physiologically relevant chromophores. The resulting quantitative contribution of each specific chromophore is in agreement with typical values for this type of tissue. These fits produced concentration values for oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin of 22.4 and 28.4 μM, which are within ranges of values cited elsewhere for skin. (M. Kobayashi et al., Analysis of nonlinear relation for skin hemoglobin imaging, Optics Express 9(13) 802-812 (2001)). Additionally, it was determined that 70.2% of the volume probed comprised of water and 0.51% was melanin. (I. Nishidate et al., Estimation of melanin and hemoglobin in skin tissue using multiple regression analysis aided by Monte Carlo simulation, Journal of Biomedical Optics 9(4) 700-710 (2004)). Whereas is it acknowledged that skin is not a homogeneous medium and that the distribution of chromophores are depth selective, to first approximation, these results remain encouraging and opportunities remain for further layer-based modeling of SMoQS. (J. R. Weber et al., Non-contact imaging of absorption and scattering in layered tissue using spatially-modulated structured light, Journal of Applied Physics, 105, 102028 (2009)).

A new embodiment of spatial frequency domain (SFD) sampling in turbid media has been provided that is capable of characterizing optical properties over the range 430 to 1050 nm, with 1.5 nm resolution. Utilizing a SFD platform for quantitative spectroscopy is attractive not only for its ability to characterize turbid media across a very broad range of wavelengths, but the requisite instrumentation is relatively low in cost, non-contact, and simple to implement. The inherent flexibility of this approach allows for the tuning of the system for targeting specific wavelength regimes, permitting it to be used in a wide range of initial investigations. With the addition of scanning optics at the detection fiber, mapping of optical properties can be performed over entire region of tissue illuminated by the projected patterns. Spectral preconditioning of the source illumination would also help balance the dynamic range of detected, wavelength dependent reflectance, allowing for improved SNR in both spectral regions where absorption is characteristically strong as well as compensating for limitations in the spectral dependence in the systemic instrument function.

The in-vivo demonstration of the technique provides compelling evidence that the extracted absorption spectrum is well described by typical chromophores present in skin tissue. This analysis however was performed using a model that assumes that chromophores are homogeneously distributed in tissue. In reality, skin is heterogeneous on the scale of the interrogation volume of the device used here. Tissue interrogation over broad wavelength range will provide depth-dependent contrast to tissue chromophore species and structures, ranging from sub-millimeter probing depths in the visible to depth-sensitivity of many millimeters in the near infrared. Further investigation and modeling of this differential volume effect will be necessary prior to claims of robust quantitation of optical properties in layered media. (J. R. Weber).

The initial measurements described herein illustrate the basic capabilities of SMoQS as technique for quantifying optical properties in both visible and near infrared. It is able to characterize these optical properties without any a priori assumption and perform these measurements in a non-contact paradigm conducive to in-vivo characterization of tissue.

While the invention is susceptible to various modifications, and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. 

1. An apparatus for determining surface or subsurface optical properties and/or structures of a sample of turbid media over an area of the sample comprising: a source to expose the area of the sample to one or more structured illuminations; one or more single element detectors configured to receive optical signals from one or more spatial locations on the surface of the sample; and a signal processor coupled to the one or more single element detectors and configured to reconstruct the optical data from one or more spatial locations.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the signal processor is a computer.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the source is configured to generate two or more structured light conditions.
 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the one or more single element detectors comprises one single element detector configured to collect remitted light signals from one spatial location.
 5. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the two or more structured light conditions are spectrally structured.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the source is configured to generate one structured light condition.
 7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the one or more single element detectors comprise two or more spatially diverse single element detectors configured to collect remitted light signals from two or more spatially diverse locations.
 8. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the one or more single element detectors comprise two or more spectrally diverse single element detectors configured to collect two or more spectrally diverse remitted light signals.
 9. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the single element detector is the entrance pupil for an optical relay device.
 10. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the optical relay device is an optical fiber.
 11. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprises a region on the order of a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations.
 12. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprising comprises a region on the order or smaller than a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations.
 13. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprising comprises a region on the order or larger than a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations.
 14. A method of determining surface or subsurface optical properties and/or structures of a sample of turbid media over an area of the sample comprising: exposing the area of the sample to one or more structured illuminations; collecting optical signals from one or more spatial locations on the surface of the sample with one or more single-element detectors; and reconstructing optical data from the one or more spatial locations.
 15. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of exposing the area of the sample to one or more structured illuminations includes exposing the area of the sample to two or more structured light conditions.
 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the two or more structured light conditions are spectrally structured.
 17. The method of claim 15 wherein the step of receiving optical signals from one or more spatial locations on the surface of the sample includes receiving optical signals with a single element detector from one spatial location on the surface of the sample when the area of the sample is exposed to two or more structured light conditions.
 18. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of exposing the area of the sample to one or more structured illuminations includes exposing the area of the sample to one structured light condition.
 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the step of receiving optical signals from one or more spatial locations on the surface of the sample includes receiving optical signals with two or more spatially diverse single element detectors from two or more spatially diverse locations on the surface of the sample when the area of the sample is exposed to one structured light condition.
 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the one structured light condition is spectrally structured and the one or more single element detectors comprise two or more spectrally diverse single element detectors configured to collect two or more spectrally diverse remitted light signals.
 21. The method of claim 14 wherein the one or more structured illuminations are spatially structured light waves extending over the surface of the sample.
 22. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of reconstructing includes reconstructing the information from the remitted structured light wave extending over the surface of the area of the sample from the optical signals received with the one or more single-element detectors from the one or more spatial locations on the surface of the sample.
 23. The method of claim 14 wherein the single element detector is the entrance pupil for an optical relay device.
 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the optical relay device is an optical fiber.
 25. The method of claim 14 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprises a region on the order of a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations.
 26. The method of claim 14 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprises a region on the order or smaller than a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations.
 27. The method of claim 14 wherein an individual one of the one or more spatial locations comprises a region on the order or larger than a feature of an individual one of the one or more structured illuminations. 